Good outcome of liver transplantation in patients with pre-existing renal cell carcinoma.

The presence of a pre-existing or recent extra-hepatic solid tumor was considered for a long time as an absolute contraindication to liver transplantation, by fear of futility with an unacceptable increase in non-liver-related mortality. However, cancer-related mortality in solid malignancies is heterogeneous, and experts suggest that case-by-case multidisciplinary decisions should be made. Here, we report the cases of 3 patients with favorable oncological and liver outcome in patients with renal cell carcinoma detected during pre-transplant evaluation that nonetheless underwent liver transplantation.

[Arterial embolization of polycystic kidneys as an alternative to ergonomic nephrectomy in renal pre-transplantation. Monocentric retrospective study]. / Embolisation artérielle des reins polykystiques en alternative à la néphrectomie ergonomique en pré greffe rénale. Étude monocentrique rétrospective sur 15 cas.

PURPOSE: This study aims at providing a retrospective assessment of the decrease in renal volume after renal artery embolization (RAE) among a group of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic renal disease and for whom transplantation, for ergonomic reasons was temporarily advised against. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between November 2014 and March 2017, as part of pre-transplantory procedure 15 patients, including 11 men and 4 women benfited from renal embolization (RAE) in a context of preparation for transplant in Lille University Hospital. All of the patients were suffering from autosomal dominant polycystic renal disease (ADPKD) at a severe or terminal stage of renal disease. RESULTS: The original mean total kidney volume (TKV) was 2550.6 cm3±1771 (1102 cm3; 7310 cm3), the average TKV at 3 months was 1684 cm3±1539 (648 cm3; 6930 cm3) with an average decrease of 33% in the volume (5.2%; 83.9%) (95% confidence interval [0.229-0.436]) (P<0.01) and 1632±1743 (599 cm3; 6758 cm3) at 6 months with an average decrease of 40.7% (7.6%; 64.1%) (IC95% 0.306-0.508) (P<0.01). Among the 15 patients, 13 had their contraindication removed and to date 7 have had successful transplants. One failure due to a very high initial volume (7310cm3) required a secondary nephrectomy. No post-embolization syndrome has been noticed, 2 minor complications occurred (13%) involving a difficult resumption of transit and there was one case of hematuria. CONCLUSION: ERA procedures must have a place in the ergonomic transplant strategy of patients with ADPKD with a low complication rate and a high efficiency. Nephrectomy indications before transplantation must therefore be reconsidered due to a major postoperative risk. Our results are in line with larger scale studies. Nevertheless, these results need to be confirmed by a large-scale randomized prospective study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Prostate cancer before renal transplantation: A multicentre study.

INTRODUCTION: The surgical issues of renal transplantation (RT) after localized prostate cancer (PC) treatment and oncological outcomes after transplantation in patients on the waiting list with a history of PC were unknown. We conducted a retrospective multicentre study including all patients with PC diagnosed before the kidney transplantation. METHODS: Fifty-two patients were included from December 1993 to December 2015. The median age at diagnosis of PC was 59.8years old. RESULTS: The median PSA rate at diagnosis was 7ng/mL. Twenty-seven, Twenty-four, and one PC were respectively low, intermediate and high risk according to d'Amico classification. Forty-three patients were treated by radical prostatectomy (RP): 28 retropubic, 15 laparoscopic and 3 by a perineal approach. Eighteen patients had a lymph node dissection. Four patients were treated with external radiotherapy and 2 by brachytherapy. Eight patients underwent radiotherapy after surgery. The median time between PC treatment and RT was 35.7 months. The median operating time for the renal transplantation was 180min (IQR 150-190; min 90-max 310) with a median intraoperative bleeding of 200mL (IQR 100-290; min 50-max 2000). A history of lymphadenectomy did not significantly lengthen operative time (P=0.34). No recurrence of PC was observed after a median follow of 36months. CONCLUSION: PC discovered before RT should be treated with RP to assess the risk of recurrence and decrease waiting for a RT. If the PC is at low risk of recurrence, it seems possible to shorten the waiting time before the RT after a multidisciplinary discussion meeting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Factors influencing the choice of nondonor families in a French organ-harvesting center]. / Analyse des raisons motivant le refus du don d'organes par les familles de patients en état de mort encéphalique dans un centre régional de prélèvement.

OBJECTIVES: Report the reasons that lead families to refuse organ donation during their close solicitation by hospital coordination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between 2012 and 2015, including 148 (34%) refusal of organ donation among 426 patients identified in a state of brain death. A questionnaire of the family was completed for each interview. Collected data concerned patient characteristics, cause of death, description of the interview and reasons for refusal. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 50 years with a sex ratio of 1.4 men to 1 woman. The most common reason for non-donor family was the desire to maintain the integrity of the body of the patient (28%) followed by a religious order pattern (11%), brutality and suddenness of death (9%), the denial of death (6%) and early age of the donor (5%). In 39% of cases, the family said that the donor had expressed a written or oral refusal in his lifetime. CONCLUSION: A better understanding of the reasons leading to the refusal of non-donor family could provide assistance to the medical team on actions to general public with the aim to reduce the refusal rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Family refusal of organ donation: a retrospective study in a French organ procurement center]. / Opposition des familles aux dons d'organes: analyse rétrospective des causes de refus dans un centre régional de prélèvement.

OBJECTIVES: In France, organ donation refusal rates approach 32% of eligible brain deaths. Outright family refusal represents the primary barrier reason for declining organ donation. This retrospective study evaluated factors influencing this decision. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review at Lille Hospital, France, was conducted on brain-death patients eligible for organ donation between 2010 and 2011. Data were collected regarding patient characteristics, death conditions and reasons for refusal based upon family interview. Descriptive statistic analyses were conducted to identify circumstances associated with family refusal. RESULTS: Of 227 eligible organ donors identified, 70 families (30.8%) refused organ donation. The most frequent reason for refusal was desire to keep the body's wholeness (46.3%), followed by religion (16.4%), mistrust of the medical community (13.4%), and revolt against society (6%). The most common causes of death associated with refusal were brutality and suddenness of death (44.8%), early age (23.9%), denial of death (17.9%), and the family culpability (11.9%). In 30% of cases, the family followed the deceased's wishes before his death. CONCLUSION: Family refusal remains a significant factor associated with the approximately one third of declined eligible organ donations. This retrospective analysis suggested that the most important cause for refusal was a desire to keep the body's wholeness, and the brutality and suddenness of the potential donor's death. Additional research addressing these factors, and their underlying causes, paired with measures to improve professional training and public awareness are warranted to improve organ donation rates.

[Andrological description of a population of azoospermic men with agenesis of the vas deferens]. / Description andrologique d'une population azoosperme avec une agénésie des canaux déférents consultant pour infertilité.

CONTEXT: In the 1990's, congenital agenesis of the vas deferens was identified as a minor form of cystic fibrosis in relation to the frequency of mutations of the CFTR gene associated. It is responsible for masculine infertility by obstructive azoospermia; which is not accessible to a surgical treatment. However, surgical sperm retrieval and injection de spermatozoïde en intracytopasmique (ICSI) allow fatherhood for these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 104 consecutive patients from 1996 to 2006. A comprehensive clinical, spermiologic, hormonal, imaging and genetic workup was carried on. The data from the surgical extractions and the attempts of ICSI were collected. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of the patients had a mutation of the CFTR gene; ultrasound imaging revealed a renal or a seminal vesicle abnormality in 20% and 84.5% of the patients, respectively. The association of a semen volume less than 2 mL with a pH less than 7.2, a fructose less than 2 and mean sudoral chlore greater than 60 mmol/L enabled an immediate identification of 30% of patients carrier of the mutation and without renal abnormality. The sperm extraction rate was 98%. CONCLUSION: A search for the CFTR gene mutations and an ultrasound imaging of the genito-urinary system are essential to the workup of these patients. The association of a semen volume less than 2 mL, a semen pH less than 7.2 and a fructose less than 2 must point towards a minor form of cystic fibrosis and prompt the workup of genetic abnormalities and sudoral chlore testing. The results of the sperm extraction combined to the technical advances of IVF/ICSI allow excellent pregnancy rates of 66% for the companions of these patients.